Cachalot

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:48 pm

Who has replaced the Cachalot planet?!!
I jumped, byued NT, and... very surprized.

lensman · Post by **lensman** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:45 pm

Read the comments in the post about system 209 ( go to page 3 ). This will answer all of your questions.There is nothing you can do about it.

zaroba · Post by **zaroba** » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:52 pm

http://www.theuniversal.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5560

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:52 am

This is not answer. I asked "Who?". I want to know name of Cachalot's owner/creator.
I am not sure, but i suppose that this human is cheater.

zaroba · Post by **zaroba** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:22 pm

land on it and type *owner
its the same way any of us would see who owns it

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:38 pm

Not landable (not working).

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:49 pm

"but i suppose that this human is cheater."

I prefer this phrase to the much more accusatory tone you take in another thread

The name of the planet owner is :

Alfred

And I wasn't aware that moving an unregistered planet is considered cheating.

.

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:50 pm

Alfred wrote:"but i suppose that this human is cheater."
I prefer this phrase to the much more accusatory tone you take in another thread :wink:

I am sorry if i am not right. But i am not sure that i am not right.

Alfred wrote:And I wasn't aware that moving an unregistered planet is considered cheating.

Moving isn't. But the purpose of this moving - may be :-)))

lensman · Post by **lensman** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:05 pm

There is no cheating. Just read what Fooli has to say on the subject. Use the lick zaroba has put in. at the top of post.

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:34 am

Now your beginning to irritate me Max,suppositions are one thing ,accusations are another..Being a relatively new player it seems your rather quick to judge others motives,especially when it would be rather easy to make a plausible accusation that you have exploited bugs in the game,and proposed some things that might be considered hacks.You've been given the benefit of doubt on several occasions here as to your motives,it would be polite if you would extend that same courtesy to others.

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:47 am

After re-reading the opening statement of this thread,I've come to realize what your main problem here is Max,your irritated that Cachalot no longer provides an infimp point for your cushy little NT trade route eh?.

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:53 pm

Sorry, too many english words to understand for me :-)
Now, when bug is fixed, and i can disclose the reason of my "suppose".
There was found a bug, that allowed to do InfImp jump with cargo. I reported this bug, but in the same day i have seen, that the planet "Cachalot" was moved to final destination of 42k (or 30k for Cobra) trade route.
Anyhow, now planets are removed, bugs are fixed. So let's bury this theme.
Alfred, excuse me please for suspicions if they were groundless

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:07 pm

Rather thin evidence for your suspicions there Max,but consider it dropped ..BTW check out planet location now,just for you Max

Max Brown · Post by **Max Brown** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:34 pm

Alfred wrote:Rather thin evidence for your suspicions there Max,but consider it dropped ..BTW check out planet location now,just for you Max ;)

He-he, thanks for caution! Nice joke :-)

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:56 pm

Glad you liked it